9/11 Hutchison Effect Review

To support her conclusion that Directed Energy Weaponry (DEW) brought down the twin towers, Dr. Judy Wood draws parallels between the debris from the twin towers' aftermath and experimental results of the Hutchison Effect. I do not dispute those similarities, however correlation does not imply causation. Because John Hutchison uses energy beams in his experimental apparatus does not conclusively implicate the deployment of DEW in the twin towers disaster. A positive correlation exists between ice cream consumption and drownings. Both peak in the summer. However, no causal relationship exists between the two.

I present an alternate source as the probable cause for the observed effects in an earlier blog entry: 9/11 Dr. Judy Wood Review. In this blog entry I go deeper into the subject, down to the molecular level, including a graphical representation of the science behind molecular dissociation, and the chemical reactions of positive metal ions and water to produce cold fire and rust through oxidation.

Here is a video of a radio interview including Dr. Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson presenting their findings.

9/11 - WTC Destruction and the Hutchison Effect - Part 1


9/11 - WTC Destruction and the Hutchison Effect - Part 2

Hidden Defects

The trouble with mainstream science and mainstream scientists is that only mainstream theories are considered when trying to determine the cause of anomalous evidence. "When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail." For sure, Dr. Judy Wood examined a larger toolbox than orthodox scientists will ever admit to, and for that she deserved a great deal of credit for her courage. However, only looking inside a toolbox overlooks other options where thinking outside the box is indicated.

Paradigm shifts in science routinely come from thinking outside the box. Galileo, Newton, Darwin, and Einstein invented some of the tools employed by mainstream scientists today, but they thought outside the box to create them, which means that a thought experiment is in order.

Molecular Dissociation

Here is a pseudo-molecular level representation of a gas. The number of protons and electrons is equal for each molecule. The reason that air molecules with a neutral electric charge do not stick together is because electrons surround the periphery and like electrostatic charge repels like. The electron outer shell of each molecule causes the individual molecules to repel each other.

_‡‡_	_‡‡_	_‡‡_	_‡‡_	_‡‡_	_‡‡_	_‡‡_	_‡‡_
_‡‡_	_‡‡_	_‡‡_	_‡‡_	_‡‡_	_‡‡_	_‡‡_	_‡‡_

Here is the same pseudo-molecular representation of a solid, with the same number of molecules, i.e. sixteen. Electrons are shared to create molecular bonds. Notice the solid is more compact than a gas, which translates into the greater density of solids compared to gases.

_‡‡_‡‡_‡‡_‡‡_‡‡_‡‡_‡‡_‡‡_
_‡‡_‡‡_‡‡_‡‡_‡‡_‡‡_‡‡_‡‡_

Now suppose the molecular bonds of the above solid are suddenly ripped asunder. The result is represented below, a positive ion particulate cloud. All the molecules are positive ions, since the positive charge of four outnumbers the negative charge of electrons by two, three, or four in the representation below. All these molecules repel each other because they are positive ions.

¯‡‡¯	_‡‡¯	_‡‡_	¯‡‡¯	_‡‡¯	‡‡¯	_‡‡¯	_‡‡¯
_‡‡	_‡‡	_‡‡_	‡‡	_‡‡_	¯‡‡_	‡‡_	‡‡_

A positive ion particulate cloud is consistent with the effects Dr. Judy Wood cataloged that resemble results of the Hutchison Effect. Transmutation of the atomic elements by changing the atomic nucleus is not necessary, therefore fusion which increases atomic number and fission which reduces atomic number are outside the range of consideration here. In the video, Andrew Johnson mentions "cold fusion" which taken literally is not relevant.

Probable Cause

It is the concentration in time and space of the positive ions that triggered and sustained this process, which began as pulverized concrete from the floors of the World Trade Center that generated the dust cloud. A Directed Energy Weapon is not the only possible source for this outcome. In fact, a Directed Energy Weapon is not the probable cause either.

On her website Dr. Wood offers this quote, "When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." A much simpler probable cause is a natural runaway chain reaction triggered by the pancaking of the concrete floors within the twin towers that was concentrated in time and space. The destruction of the twin towers was a rare event, requiring a unique perspective and a compelling argument.

Positive Ion Particulate Cloud

The positive ion particulate cloud hypothesis is the counter-argument to the Directed Energy Weapon scenario. As upper floors slammed into floors below, the concrete pulverized. With primary support columns displaced to the exterior of the World Trade Center skyscrapers the floors inside the twin towers cascaded down like a piston inside a cylinder. The air inside compressed and blew out the windows like an accordion or bellows, exhausting air, broken concrete, dust, paper, etcetera. The potential energy of the height of the floors was converted into kinetic energy as the floors dropped slamming into floors below. Upon contact, the kinetic energy converted into fragmenting the concrete floors and severing molecular bonds along these breaks.

The sheer scale and concentration of the destruction in time and space was a rare event. The concrete ejected from the tower appeared to disintegrate in mid air. Immersed in the positive ion cloud, the surface electrons were shanghaied from concrete and other solid matter, breaking molecular bonds in the process, and creating more positive ions. The positive ions repelled each other expanding the dust cloud. The most susceptible atoms to have electrons shanghaied are metals, and hydrogen. Concrete contains calcium, which is a metal. Glass contains trace metallic elements. Positive ion dust particles shanghaied electrons from vulnerable solids it contacted. What began with pulverized concrete grew into a runaway chain reaction. No externally generated electromagnetic energy was necessary to start or sustain it.

As the positive ion cloud shanghaied electrons, solid material underwent molecular dissociation, which fed the positive ion cloud and the total deficit of electrons increased exponentially from the conversion of solid matter to positively charged dust particles. The destruction of the World Trade Center exhibited a previously unidentified exponential process like an explosion in an entirely different dimension. John Hutchison's experiments are child's play in comparison.

Oxidation or Cold Fire

Metal ions oxidized in a process that produced cold fire, when reacting with molecules containing oxygen with weak molecular bonds, i.e. water or water vapor: H₂O. Trying to extinguish an oxidizing metal fire with water is impossible. That's why some metals rust when they get wet. Here are a couple of chemical reaction equations that produce rust from positive ions of iron and water that also release hydrogen atoms stripped of electrons, i.e. protons.

Fe²⁺ + 2 H₂O ⇌ Fe(OH)₂ + 2 H⁺
Fe³⁺ + 3 H₂O ⇌ Fe(OH)₃ + 3 H⁺

Glass

Automobile windshields were missing, not smashed. Windshield glass is laminated. A sheet of plastic is sandwiched between layers of glass. This prevents a passenger from getting decapitated in a collision. Of all the images of cars, windshields are missing, not smashed.

Glass contains silica, SiO₂, which holds it's electrons tight against being shanghaied. People could still breathe, so atmospheric oxygen, O₂, also held it's own, whereas metals did not. Metal atoms contained in glass include sodium, calcium, magnesium, and aluminum. Skyscraper windows also contain reflective coatings which contain metal atoms. Metal atoms easily succumb to having their valence electrons shanghaied. Metals are good conductors of electricity, which is the flow of electron across the surface.

Flipped Cars

Car engine blocks were gone, disintegrated. The process of converting solid iron or aluminum into ionic dust particles also changes the volume of the material. The engine block dust particles needed to go someplace, and the engine compartment is only open on the bottom. Rapid expansion and vaporization of the material in the engine compartment would generate a downward thrust at the front end of the car. An equal and opposite force would apply in the upward direction on the engine compartment hood. The front end of the car would lift off the ground quickly, while the rear tires remained on the ground. This would cause the cars to somersault, pivot on their rear bumper, and land upside down. This is not the result a beamed energy weapon could produce. It was the consequence of the ionic dust as it shanghaied electrons from the all too willing metal making up engine blocks.

Dirt

Those responsible for clean up duty hauled in truckloads of dirt, spread the dirt around, picked it back up, and hauled it out again. Dr. Wood indicated that this is the method used to clean up toxic spills. This is reminiscent of how a doctor will treat the symptoms of a disease when no cure is known nor definitive diagnosis is made.

Hutchison Effect

Although the Hutchison Effect produces similar results, it requires the use of external apparatus. In the case of the World Trade Center this equipment was unnecessary.

Occam's Razor

According to Occam's Razor the simplest explanation should prevail. Directed Energy Weapons is not the simplest explanation for the destruction of the World Trade Center. The positive ion particulate cloud hypothesis makes the fewest possible assumptions to arrive at a consistent and comprehensive explanation for the 9/11 disaster. The necessary and sufficient conditions presented also resolve issues with the mainstream account.