Antimatter Hypothesis: Crop Circles

Let’s consider what would happen should antimatter reach ground level, in a farmer’s field perhaps. Any biological organism would suffer severe cellular damage from an overdose of gamma radiation produce by matter antimatter annihilations, and the gravitational experience would mimic the proverbial ‘being stuck between a rock and a hard place.’ The crops would flatten to the ground. This is the initial description of crop circles. For sure, hoaxes have been perpetrated since then, but early reports of crop circles are consistent with this model of antimatter with antigravity properties. If human nature hasn’t changed in millennia then modern crop circle hoaxers may be descendants of early inhabitants of the Nazca Desert in Peru.

Anecdotal Evidence

When I was a child, my mother relayed an incident some of her relatives told her. My mother, now deceased, grew up on a farm in Nebraska. Her relatives were driving home at night when they spotted a light in a corn field. They pulled over and stopped the car beside the road, turned off their car lights and watched the object. When an oncoming car approached they thought the passengers would notice also, but the light dimmed so the other car continued on without stopping. They stayed for awhile and then went home.

The next day they returned and went to the farmer, who owned the field. They told the story of what they saw. They all went to the field together, and found the crops flattened in a circle. I cannot recall specifically how my mother described the scene, all the other parts of the story are easy to relate to. I cannot recall for certain whether she described the scene as "charred" or "scorched." I heard this story long before I ever learned about the crop circle phenomena. The dimming effect could be an optical illusion. When we see headlights at night our visual acuity deteriorates and we need time to readjust to darkness after the light is gone.

EPR Paradox Review

The following thought experiment is a common sense version of the EPR paradox of quantum mechanics proposed by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen.

Experimenter 1 enters a bank and obtains from a teller two bills in each of six denominations: one, five, ten, twenty, fifty, and one hundred. Experimenter 1 enters the safe deposit box area and segregates each bill into a separate envelope, making sure that for each denomination one of the pair is face up while the other is face down with respect to the flap side of its containing envelope. Furthermore, both envelopes of each denomination are placed together inside a larger envelop. In all there are six large envelopes, each of which contains two smaller envelopes, which both contain the same denomination within the larger envelope. All envelopes are sealed and the bills cannot be seen through the envelopes. Experimenter 1 randomly shuffles the six envelopes and places them inside a safe deposit box, and locks it.

Experimenter 1 leaves the bank and gives the safe deposit key to experimenter 2. This is a double blind experiment. Experimenter 2 enters the bank and goes into the safe deposit box area. Experimenter 2 rolls a die, which yields a number from one to six inclusively. Experimenter 2 opens the safe deposit box and removes from the stack of six envelopes the envelope that corresponds to the number on the die. Either counting down from the top or up from the bottom makes no difference to the experiment, although it does make a difference in the outcome. Experimenter 2 returns the other five envelopes to the safe deposit box, locks it, and exits the bank with the one large envelope that was randomly selected. Outside, experimenter 2 opens the large envelope and affixes correct postage and the mailing addresses of two participants, one to each smaller envelope, which remain sealed. Experimenter 2 mails the two letters.

Participant 1 and participant 2 receive the letters in the mail. Participant 1 and participant 2 are located as far away from each other as technically feasible. After confirmation of delivery, the two participants simultaneously open their letters. According to a controversial interpretation of quantum mechanics, before the letters are opened the contents are in a state of quantum superposition. This means that the denominations inside the two letters are indeterminate and fluctuate between all probable combinations up until the letters are opened and examined. This leads to the conclusion that a split second difference in timing determines the denomination of both letters simultaneously. Furthermore, if the letters are separated by a great distance, then under certain conditions that information travels faster than the speed of light. Einstein stipulated that information cannot travel faster than the speed of light, thus the paradox. It was the intent of Einstein and his colleagues in proposing the EPR paradox to prove the absurdity of the Copenhagen interpretation.

In the bank experiment, the probability of the result being any particular denomination is one in six. For any one participant, the probability of the result being face up is one in two. The probability that both participants obtain the same denomination is one, and the probability that the participants obtain the same parity of heads or tails is zero. The Copenhagen interpretation claims that only an observer’s consciousness will collapse the probability wave function and firmly realized the denomination. The common sense interpretation indicates that the denomination was determined at the time experimenter 2 randomly selected the envelope, and that face up was determined at the time the address labels were affixed, both results are predetermined without looking. Counter intuitive interpretations of quantum mechanics led to the conclusion that Schrödinger’s cat is simultaneously both alive and dead.

Einstein refused to believe the “spooky action at a distance” implications of quantum mechanics and Einstein was right. Beta decay is a subatomic embodiment of the EPR paradox. When an atomic element decays by positron emission, pair production makes an electron positron pair from energy. The electron combines with a proton in the nucleus of the atom and becomes a neutron. The positron is emitted and can travel some distance before being annihilated by another electron, which produces a pair of gamma rays. In which case, the results of pair production are two far different outcomes, which contradict the Copenhagen interpretation of the EPR paradox. Therefore, the Copenhagen interpretation is false and Schrödinger’s cat is either alive or dead but not both.

Uncertainty resides in the subject not in the object. The surrounding environment dictates how long the preservation of synchronized properties last between a particle antiparticle pair produced together. Immutable properties preserved throughout the life of a particle derive from the conservation of electric charge and gravitation. In the case of photons this includes polarization. But properties synchronized at pair production that are subject to environmental interaction include momentum, and spin axis orientation.

Quantum entanglement goes far beyond pair production to fantasize mystical quantum level linkages among disparate groups of particles. Misconstrued interpretations of quantum entanglement lead to absurd conclusions. Quantum entanglement is like extending the observed occurrence of identical twins to conclude that all people have identical DNA. This is absurd. The leap from related properties between particle antiparticle pairs to related properties between groups of objects is indefensible on the grounds of pair production. Quantum entanglement beyond pair production is an intellectually bankrupt fantasy, as is any theory based upon it. Attractive and repulsive forces exist at different scales between subatomic particles, atoms, molecules, photons, and masses of both matter and antimatter.

Quantum mechanics is no place to find evidence for consciousness or spiritualism. Free will is a consequence of choice given inconclusive data. New age spiritualism built upon the uncertainty that quantum mechanics purported to predict. Uncertainty exists for two reasons: the glut or dearth of information. No two baseball games are ever the same, due to information glut. Uncertainty in dating arises from information dearth. The act of measurement affects the object being measured, which ruins any attempt to measure properties with absolute precision or in combination.

Consciousness is reinforced self awareness. Spiritualism is coherent group awareness. “Where two or more are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.”¹ Gandhi phrased it this way, “Truth is God,” then there’s the vernacular parlance, “God is love,” or the idiomatic, “two heads are better than one.” Even widespread belief in false theories is a form of coherence. With coordinated effort, coherence builds correlations between disparate entities, whereas the concept of quantum entanglement is intellectually bankrupt. Enough about fantasies, let’s return to the real world.

---

¹Matthew 18:20

Best UFO footage ever?

The Internet video ‘Best UFO footage ever?’ was recorded by Dr. Willem Heijster, from Breda, The Netherlands on August 10, 1989 near Estepona, Spain. The object in the video appears to be a stationary cloud in an otherwise cloudless sky, but its surface exhibits strange turbulent behavior. If the object in this video is a genuine Antimatter Matter Object (AMMO) then we can speculate about its natural properties. Equivalent matter and antimatter subatomic particles exhibit opposite electrostatic and magnetic forces. The antimatter hypothesis is that equivalent matter and antimatter subatomic particles also exhibit opposite gravitational forces.


Of necessity, antimatter is extraterrestrial in origin, since matter and antimatter annihilate each other. Without lateral momentum and avoiding a direct collision with solid matter, AMMO on a collision course with Earth would decelerate and hover. Einstein discovered the equivalence of gravity and acceleration. When a meteor composed of matter falls to Earth it accelerates, since with gravitational forces like attracts like. However, AMMO decelerates and hovers since opposite gravitational forces either repel or neutralize each other. If gravity and acceleration are equivalent, then within a gravitational field antigravity produces deceleration, hovering, or acceleration in the opposite direction.

Electrons are attracted by the electrostatic force to antimatter surface positrons. This produces a bubble-like shimmering surface reminiscent of mercury. Electrons are negatively charged, and water vapor molecules are electric dipoles. Among all the constituents of air, most do not exhibit the property of electric dipoles. Therefore, in a high humidity environment, water vapor would attract by electrostatic forces to antimatter. The incident in the video occurred offshore a beach in Spain, which is consistent with AMMO. The negative end of a water vapor dipole would attract to antimatter surface positrons, or the positive end of a water vapor dipole would attract to antimatter antiprotons. Held in place, water vapor would then concentrate and condense out of the atmosphere around this charged attractor. From the outside it appears cloudlike, which is again consistent with AMMO in conjunction with water vapor.

When zoomed in the object in the video resembles Saturn, a ball in the center surrounded by an inner tube torus. Ions in a magnetic field traverse field lines in a spiral, like an electromagnet. Ions cause auroras at Earth’s poles. But water vapor is composed of dipoles, not ions. It appears that water vapor molecules are concentrating in the equivalent of Van Allen Belts around antimatter with its own magnetic field. Near the end of the video this message appears, ‘the object was there for about an hour and then fade (sic) away like smoke.’ In the end the hovering antimatter dissolved. The slow rate of dissolve and stable position implies high density antimatter exhibiting magnetism like an asteroid. Gamma radiation would eject positrons from the metallic antimatter, via the photoelectric effect, to annihilate electrons and start a chain reaction. The behavior of the object in this video is consistent with the properties of antimatter with antigravity.

Antimatter Hypothesis: Antigravity Technology

An urban myth claims that only an extraterrestrial invasion could unify the human race. How about an extraterrestrial opportunity? Harnessing antigravity technology will change the future of transportation. Just imagine the energy efficient delivery of satellites into orbit. Air transportation would never fall out of the sky and crash again, because that would defy the law of antigravity. Antimatter harvested from outer space, safely outside Earth’s atmosphere, will seed a new industry of practical applications for antigravity technology.

Antigravity vehicles become feasible by surrounding a dense, metallic, antimatter material with an insulating layer of matter holding a vacuum. By an insulating layer I mean a nonmetallic substance like a ceramic or a carbon lattice like graphite, not a conductive material where the electrons are free to flow. The containment vessel needs to prevent the possibility of electrons combining with positrons from the antimatter. Like magnetic bearings, gravity-antigravity repulsion will keep the two materials separated.

Space faring solar furnaces may be needed to process the antimatter into spheres, rods, ingots, monoliths, or whatever desirable shape. A massive antimatter sphere suspended at the center of a hollow matter ball, or a large antimatter rod down the center of a hollow matter cylinder produces gravity pushing outward on the inside matter walls, where unattached matter will drop. Placing antimatter in the skin of the craft, an antigravity vehicle becomes frictionless in Earth’s atmosphere. The interior of the spacecraft would exhibit gravitational anomalies full time since vehicles of neutral gravitational buoyancy possess both matter and antimatter. With the proper propulsion system, antigravity vehicles are conceivable with benign environmental side effects.

Antimatter Hypothesis: Evidence

After the antimatter hypothesis is confirmed, the top priority appears obvious. The primary goal is to contain large samples of high density antimatter within a vacuum. To accomplish this aim, a survey of extraterrestrial antimatter candidates needs to be conducted, while proceeding along two separate fronts: small objects in near Earth orbit, and large objects anywhere in the solar system.

Near Earth orbit antimatter interacts with the solar wind and Earth’s atmosphere producing direct gamma ray emissions through annihilations, and indirect electromagnetic radiation through reflection, ionization, and Compton scattering. Detectors attuned to various wavelengths need to be deployed to Earth orbit to record the phenomenon, and plans need to be devised to capture antimatter specimens.

Large body antimatter located in our solar system needs to be detected through anomalous gravitational behavior. Antimatter may reside within the asteroid belt, pushed out by the inner solar system, and pushed in by Jupiter; at Trojan points or planetary rings. The rings of Saturn might contain antimatter. Detailed telemetry needs to be conducted and analyzed to detect antigravity anomalies between gravitationally interacting bodies. Recall that like gravitational forces attract, but opposite gravitational forces repel. Once antimatter has been located, the next step is to corral the substance for experimentation with the ultimate goal of manufacturing transportation vehicles.

In addition, meteor impacts produce different crater signatures depending upon whether the meteor was matter or antimatter. New simulations must distinguish between the two, and craters throughout the solar system reclassified and studied in finer detail.

NASA has promoted humans in space to secure funding for space exploration. That paradigm now takes second stage. Robotic spacecraft designed to exploit the economic benefits of antimatter are far more cost effective and lucrative, with a huge backlog of pressing problems here on Earth awaiting the application of antigravity technology.

Antimatter Hypothesis: Cyclical Cellular Cosmology

The Cyclical Cellular Cosmological model is predicated upon three premises:
    1. Symmetrical forces.
    2. A linear, zero centered coordinate system.
    3. A scalable cellular mechanism for growth and propagation.

Identifying the excommunicated antigravity component was a consequence of the first and second premises. Assuming that antimatter possesses the antigravity property led to the identification, explanation, and demystification of the AMMO phenomenon.

So in essence, the premises provided a framework for identifying supporting evidence. Antigravity also solved the problem of how to fragment a black hole during cellular division, the sought after cosmic level mechanism of premise three. In hindsight, fragmenting black holes proved an invalid hypothesis. The last key piece of the puzzle fell into place when I examined an annotated Hubble Space Telescope image. Circles identified globular clusters surrounding an elliptical galaxy, which I recognized as a baby picture.

Credit: NASA, ESA and the Hubble Heritage (STScI/AURA)-ESA/Hubble Collaboration. Acknowledgment: M. West (ESO, Chile)
The date was Thursday, 29 May 2008. On Thursday, 5 June 2008, feeling confidence in the model and wanting to be comprehensive I tackled the formation of the enigmatic barred spiral galaxies. On Sunday, 15 June 2008 I realized antiparticle accretion disks act like gauntlets that produce relativistic jets. On Tuesday, 1 July 2008 I recognized spiral galaxy rim dust around elliptical galaxies, and realized a continuum of galaxy evolution as a consequence of inside-out galaxy formation.

Antimatter Hypothesis: Abstract

A viral thought experiment unifies subatomic and cosmic forces into a single, consistent paradigm. Three fundamental forces of nature are postulated as necessary and sufficient: electric charge, magnetism, and gravitation. A symmetry preserving, antigravity component completes the subatomic model, wherein antimatter possess antigravity properties. At cosmic scales finite size black holes form in one of two states, matter or antimatter, with implications for cosmology. A self-replicating, cyclical, cellular cosmological model is proposed. In an extrapolation of Hawking radiation, synthesis of gravitationally emitted neutrons from antimatter black holes, and the antineutron-matter black hole obverse, is postulated as the source of cosmic hydrogen. Harvesting the intergalactic medium, globular clusters breed around rural black holes, whereas jets depart urban, accretion disk black holes that grow into galaxies. Galaxies form new black holes continuing the circle of life. A galaxy is either all matter or all antimatter, while its parent black hole is the converse, which explains the apparent disparity of matter and antimatter in the visible universe. Relativistic neonatal neutral nucleons emitted from parent black holes accelerate through accretion disk nozzles that form jets and decay into hydrogen. Inside-out formation of galaxies is postulated as a function of black hole mass, neonatal neutral nucleon birth rate, accretion disk nozzle shape, jet precession, density of the surrounding antiparticle medium, and age. Jets form barred spiral, spiral, and elliptical galaxies in three consecutive stages of the same inside-out process. Globular clusters spawned from elliptical galaxies evolve into galaxy clusters. As galaxies proliferate, disperse, and merge, matter and antimatter leapfrog one another every other galactic generation. Consistent evidence from cosmic imagery and detectors is presented in support. Compelling evidence of dense antimatter objects is offered, and properties of antimatter and antigravity are assessed.

Observations and measurements consistent with this heretical model include the following: disparity of matter and antimatter in the visible universe, abundance of cosmic hydrogen, an expanding universe as evidenced by red shifts, gamma ray bursts, black holes at the cores of galaxies, globular clusters, black holes at the center of globular clusters, globular clusters surrounding elliptical galaxies, galaxy clusters, elliptical galaxies at the center of galaxy clusters, quasars, jets, formation of galaxies, cosmic dust around disk galaxy rims, disk galaxy central bulges, cosmic dust in rings around elliptical galaxies, young blue giant stars surrounding galaxy cores, fractal cosmology, the Great Wall, the Sloan Great Wall, space shuttle video from Earth orbit showing antimatter, antimatter matter objects (AMMO) in Earth’s atmosphere, AMMO associated with lightning, ball lightning, and crop circles.