Micro ART Review

If a male is an electron, then electrons repel each other, but together they perform work in the form of electricity. If women are protons then women form nuclear bonds with other women and couples. Couples are neutrons, which are the combination of an electron plus a proton plus an antineutrino. An antineutrino is therefore love.

The half life of a neutron is the amount of time a couple remains together or until at least one half of the partners becomes disaffect and the relationship deteriorates. Unconditional love is a neutron with an infinite half life. A mother and a son also form a neutron.

Beta decay is the decay of a neutron into a proton and an electron. When a boy reaches puberty he tends to go his own way and the bond with his mother weakens.

Girlfriends form nuclear bonds. A mother daughter pair forms a nuclear bond.

The Oedipus story can be modeled in this way. The father feels threatened by his son. A prophesy claims that the son will displace the father, so the father sends the son away to his death. Oedipus does not die, but is adopted, grows up, leaves home, and meets his biological father on the road, where he slays him. In time he marries his mother.

A neutron is formed by one and only one pair of an electron and a proton. The idea is sound, but in real life the parent's intimate relationship resumes once the kids are asleep in bed. Instead of all or nothing, the mother/wife has two roles.

Another Greek myth is that of Odysseus, who goes off to the Trojan War leaving his wife Penelope and young son Telemachus. The war lasts ten years, and is recounted in Homer's Iliad. It took him another ten years to get home as recounted in Homer's Odyssey. By then Telemachus was twenty. When Odysseus returns he fights and kills Penelope’s suitors. Other stories say that Odysseus and Penelope have another son, and Odysseus leaves home again. As a corollary to the Oedipus complex, I offer the Penelope complex where the birth of a son displaces the husband in his relationship with his wife, and drives him away.

I define a neutron relationship, as an intimate relationship between a man and a woman. A hydrogen atom also contains an electron and a proton, but they are not as strongly bound as they are in a neutron. Statistics show that half of all hydrogen atoms end in ionization, i.e. half of all marriages end in divorce.

More Atomic Relationship Theory

Atomic Relationship Theory

How do you describe a picture to a blind person? Searching for common ground and struggling to communicate through analogies must suffice. Imagine that someday we encounter an advanced alien race like the Asgard from the SciFi Channel series Stargate SG-1. This technologically advanced race reproduces through cloning. They fully comprehend mathematics, physics, chemistry, and electronics; but they fail to fathom, on any basis whatsoever, human relationships.


You independently decide you’ll attempt to bridge this communication gap. Your breakthrough comes when you consider subatomic particles, the constituents of matter. Electrons are small and mobile like male sperm. Protons are more massive like female ova, and protons are located in the atomic nucleus like a social unit. Not only do you find this analogy intriguing. In fact, it proves compelling and you’ve discovered a profound paradigm for understanding human relationships.

So you create cross reference dictionaries between physics and human relationships, based upon subatomic particles. In addition, you craft an algebraic notation, employing logical operations from mathematics, to encode the dynamics of human relationships on a micro scale. Furthermore, you develop cross reference dictionaries between chemistry and human relationships, based upon atomic elements and molecular bonds, to describe human social units on a macro scale, while producing cross reference dictionaries between electronics and human relationships to cover workplace interactions. As an extension you discover analogies to successfully explain the dynamics of more complex human relationships involving belief systems.

Your efforts exceed all expectations. Truth is more elusive than a needle in a haystack; since both the needle and the haystack are invisible, where truth’s concerned. However; once you’ve grasped the truth it’s generally quite simple, and powerful beyond belief. Ascending to the peak of a mountaintop, your perspective becomes unobstructed in all directions. This view is truly awesome. Let’s ask our friends to come join us. Shall we?

More Atomic Relationship Theory

Primordial Construct: Chemistry

Exothermic «	Heat Δ	Endothermic »
	Gas N	Molecules ↑
Plasma –	Bonds ≈	Liquid +
Atoms ↓	Solid $

Gistmass Ubiquity Theory

A comparative analysis of paradigms, from ancient through modern sources, reveals a unified, ubiquitous pattern underlying reality. At the core of existence, one elemental set of building blocks appears pervasive, and research indicates that many generations have interpreted and transcribed this primordial structure into transformative, progressive, cultural contexts.

A paradigm, in its own terms, explains or describes aspects of common experience from a unique perspective - like trying to reconstruct a statue from a collection of blurry snapshots. How many photographs, or video segments, are adequate to fully capture a family vacation, a day in the news, the year in review, a lifetime of memories, or a person’s character? Absolute truth may ultimately prove elusive. Increasing detail amounts to overload at the expense of general comprehension. Paradigms help us recognize the universal in the wild.

A collection of pictures taken from various viewpoints increases the recorded detail of a statue, like the opinion of a jury. By comparing and combining multiple paradigms, a universal pattern emerges through reinforced similarities, lending fresh insights into the big picture, into ourselves, and into the fabric of existence. These sources arise from diverse fields of study, and cover disciplines in human nature and in the nature of reality.

As children we learn language. We notice patterns. Regularities get reinforced. As we master patterns of speech, our communication skills grow and our understanding improves. Common ground gets established, and we learn to express our needs with greater eloquence and efficiency.

Paradigms facilitate our ability to communicate novel concepts and develop mutual understanding. Gistmass Ubiquity Theory supplies the framework that not only governs the universe but ourselves as well.

More Gistmass Ubiquity Theory

Primordial Construct: Evolution

Ancestors «	Living Δ	Descendants »
	Genotype N	Environment ↑
Modification –	Natural Selection ≈	Inheritance +
Individual ↓	Phenotype $

Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution

    1. Decent with Modification
    2. Natural Selection

Primordial Construct: Politics

Status Quo «	Reform Δ	Perfect Union »
	Ideology N	Liberal ↑
Special Interests –	Bipartisanship ≈	Majority Rule +
Conservative ↓	Issues $

Political Spectrum

Precedence «	Laws Δ	Principles »
	Judiciary N	Anarchy ↑
Executive –	Democracy ≈	Legislative +
Monarchy ↓	Constituency $

Government Field

Primordial Construct: Problem Working

Tradition «	Trial Δ	Breakthrough »
	Solution N	Real World ↑
Implementation –	Evaluation ≈	Definition +
Isolation ↓	Problem $

Primordial Construct: Astrology

Fixed «	Mutable Δ	Cardinal »
	Air N	↑
Fire –	Quintessential ≈	Water +
↓	Earth $

«	Δ	Cardinal »
	Libra N	↑
Aries –	≈	Cancer +
↓	Capricorn $

Fixed «	Δ	»
	Aquarius N	↑
Leo –	≈	Scorpio +
↓	Taurus $

«	Mutable Δ	»
	Gemini N	↑
Sagittarius –	≈	Pisces +
↓	Virgo $

Primordial Construct: Mathematics

Negative «	Zero Δ	Positive »
	N	Sum ∑ ↑
Subtract –	Identity ≈	Add +
↓	$

Negative «	Zero Δ	Positive »
	N	Product ∏ ↑
Divide ÷ –	Identity ≈	Multiply × +
↓	$

Subtraction and division are not commutative, i.e. the order of the operands cannot be interchanged; but addition and multiplication are commutative, i.e. the operands are interchangeable. Sum and Product are group operations.

a – b ≠ b – a, unless a = b

a ÷ b ≠ b ÷ a, unless a = b

a + b = b + a

a × b = b × a

Negative «	Zero Δ	Positive »
	Imaginary N	Exponential ↑
Rational –	Identity ≈	Irrational +
Reciprocal ↓	Real $

A numerical anomaly exists in the realm of numbers. Square any real number and the result is always positive. For example:

2² = 2 × 2 = 4 and
(–2)² = –2 × –2 = 4.

Square roots operate in a complimentary fashion. Reversing the above example, the square root of 4 is either 2 or –2. But what is the square root of a negative number? It can be represented as the square root of a positive number, straight forward for positive real numbers, times the square root of negative one. But the square root of negative one violates the standard convention for real numbers. The square root of negative one is the numerical anomaly. The symbol for the square root of negative one is i, for imaginary, i.e. √–1 = i and i² = –1.

Given x² + 1 = 0, then x = √–1 = i or –i.
Given x² + 4 = 0, then x = √–4 = 2i or –2i.

Rational numbers can be expressed as an integer or a fraction.

Irrational numbers have no explicit integer or fraction representation. Any decimal equivalent requires an infinite number of digits. Symbolic representations are needed to express irrational numbers. Examples are: π and √2

A hindsight perspective sees the future as an extension of the past. Momentum represents the single greatest predictor of things to come.

A foresight perspective realizes that only now exists. The future is what we make it, while acting in the present.